Majd v. Bank of America, N.A.
Residential and Commercial Real Estate
January 15, 2016
- C.A. 4th
- No. G050250
- For Plaintiff: Kazem Majd, in pro. per.; Law Offices of Lenore Albert and Lenore L. Albert for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Defendant: Akerman, Justin D. Balser, Jeffrey Rasmussen and Karen Palladino Ciccone for Defendants and Respondents.
Borrower stated viable cause of action for violation of UCL based on lender’s “dual tracking” of loan modification request and foreclosure proceedings (Ikola, J.)