Another loss on appeal for BofA

Majd v. Bank of America, N.A.

Residential and Commercial Real Estate
January 15, 2016

  • C.A. 4th
  • No. G050250
  • For Plaintiff: Kazem Majd, in pro. per.; Law Offices of Lenore Albert and Lenore L. Albert for Plaintiff and Appellant.
  • For Defendant: Akerman, Justin D. Balser, Jeffrey Rasmussen and Karen Palladino Ciccone for Defendants and Respondents.

Borrower stated viable cause of action for violation of UCL based on lender’s “dual tracking” of loan modification request and foreclosure proceedings (Ikola, J.)

Read more: http://www.therecorder.com/id=1202747235468/Majd-v-Bank-of-America-NA#ixzz3xX0e39nE

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: