This is the link to the opinion. The key issue here is that the documents were fabricated and there was no way the court could overlook the forged assignments because Slorp “defaulted”.
If Slorp defaulted, who was injured and who gets the remedy of foreclosure and proceeds to the sale?
Oh, the second adversary is filed. It included RICO and FDCPA. Much like Mr. Slorp’s amended complaint.
Read the opinion. It matters