SLORP UHELD ON APPEAL: FDCPA AND RICO CHARGES STICK!!!

This is the link to the opinion.  The key issue here is that the documents were fabricated and there was no way the court could overlook the forged assignments because Slorp “defaulted”.

If Slorp defaulted, who was injured and who gets the remedy of foreclosure and proceeds to the sale?

Oh,  the second adversary is filed.  It included RICO and FDCPA. Much like Mr. Slorp’s amended complaint.

Read the opinion. It matters

http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/14a0745n-06.pdf

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s